College recruiting is behind on technology

The internet has made capable technology broadly accessible. College recruiting has not fully absorbed that change.

When I graduated high school in 2007, families could already use Google to find athletics websites, rosters, coaching directories, academic programs, and contact information. Access is not the new part. What has changed is how much work can now be automated or accelerated.

Athletes can record video on their phones. General-purpose and AI tools can gather sources, organize research, compare programs, prepare questions, and support outreach. Yet families still manage repeated data entry, separate profiles, frozen documents, scattered links, spreadsheets, and conversations that provide little feedback.

The opportunity is not simply to add another recruiting destination. It is to help families use the technology already available and make their recruiting information easier to share and evaluate.

The barrier to getting started has fallen

Official athletics websites help families identify programs and verify staff information. Search and AI tools can accelerate research and comparison. Spreadsheets can organize a working list. AI can help develop questions and produce a first draft that the athlete rewrites in their own voice.

These tools do not determine fit, guarantee a response, or replace judgment. They reduce the time and effort needed to begin.

Lower barriers do not eliminate cost. Tools may require subscriptions, and the family's time has value. But a smaller self-directed investment can serve as due diligence before a family commits to a consultant or full-service program. It can test whether the athlete appears suitable for certain programs and whether outreach produces signs of interest. A larger investment does not automatically make an athlete recruitable.

Families with the resources may prefer to offload everything immediately. For others already paying for teams, training, travel, camps, and showcases, starting smaller creates a chance to learn before adding another major expense.

The family has become the system

A recruiting campaign can involve video platforms, profiles, questionnaires, email, social media, academic records, camps, and contact spreadsheets. Each tool may work well on its own. The fragmentation appears between them.

An athlete updates a statistic in one place, then has to remember everywhere else it appears. A PDF becomes outdated when film, measurements, or academic information changes. A spreadsheet records outreach but cannot show whether anyone engaged.

The family becomes the integration layer: copying, uploading, updating, verifying, forwarding, and reconstructing what happened across separate systems.

More platforms do not automatically create a better process

Closed networks can provide discovery, education, communication, evaluations, and access to experienced people. There is a time and place for them.

But recruiting does not stay inside one platform. It moves through calls, texts, emails, social media, questionnaires, school and club coaches, and personal introductions. College coaches have told me they often want to hear directly from athletes, without another account or login standing between them and the information they need.

Poor outreach can happen anywhere. Consultants can send generic messages, and athletes can contact unrealistic programs. SiteMVP cannot prevent that. Technology does not replace relevance, judgment, or respect for a coach's time.

The answer is not to force every coach, athlete, parent, and advisor into the same product. It is to give the athlete something useful that can move between all of them.

Make direct sharing easier for coaches

This is where SiteMVP fits. It gives athletes public recruiting pages they control and can share directly with college coaches. Each page brings together current film, athletic details, academic context, achievements, and a contact form. A coach can open the link without creating an account, downloading an app, requesting access, or searching for the athlete again.

That does not mean every college has to receive the same presentation. An athlete can maintain a primary recruiting page while creating additional pages for specific colleges or opportunities, emphasizing the film and details most relevant to that outreach without rebuilding everything from the beginning.

SiteMVP pages can move through an athlete's email, a club coach's text, a family friend's introduction, or a social profile. Coaches can evaluate the athlete and use the contact form without joining another network.

Trackable links and Page Activity then provide enough feedback to help guide the next step, without identifying every visitor or pretending to know what a coach thinks. Activity is a signal, not proof of interest. It can help families decide what to improve, where to follow up, and when to invest more.

Better technology should make human expertise more valuable

The most valuable experts provide judgment and access. They understand competitive fit, recognize opportunities, make trusted introductions, and help athletes navigate consequential decisions.

Families should not need an expert simply to organize public information, maintain a page, find a contact route, or send an introduction. Technology can handle more of that work and give specialists a clearer situation to evaluate.

Better self-service tools do not make experts irrelevant. They help families understand when expertise is worth paying for and what they need it to accomplish.

Put modern recruiting tools in athletes' hands

SiteMVP complements existing tools. Search and AI support research. Email, texts, DMs, and personal introductions carry the athlete's pages. Trackable links and Page Activity provide feedback after each share.

Technology cannot recruit for an athlete. It can help families do more, learn sooner, and decide when expertise can move an opportunity forward.

‍